|
Programme Notes
Contents
- Aria
- EQ
- Hammer and Tongs
- Hot Air
- Klang
- Lament
- Ottone
- Pair/Impair
- PulseRates
- Rosaces 4
- Sorties
- ...et ainsi de suite...
- Unsound Objects
Aria was conceived as an elaboration of the gestural
properties of a gust of air, characterised by a tendency from generally
higher to generally lower register (and at least part of the way back),
coupled with a similarly-paced crescendo/diminuendo shape, and containing
a great deal of internal spatial detail. This gesture also predominates
at the "local" level, among the individual sound types and individual
musical gestures in the work. Occasionally the forward momentum is
halted by entering a "garden" of relative stasis; these become increasingly
evocative of real garden environments as the work progresses.
As a counterpoint to this are elements recalling the more vocal
and cultural connotations of the word "aria". To emphasise this
aspect of the human voice within the work, many of the sounds in
Aria were produced using the EMS Vocoder in Studio
Charybde of the Groupe de Musique Experimentale
de Bourges (France).
Aria was commissioned by the GMEB and was composed
in their studios during two visits in 1987, and in the Electroacoustic
Music Studio of The University of Birmingham (who also provided
financial assistance in travelling to Bourges). It appears on
Articles indéfinis, a Jonty Harrison
"solo" CD on the empreintes DIGITALes label
(Montreal). I am indebted to Adrian Hunter for his invaluable help
as Studio Assistant during the final stages of assembling the piece
in early April 1988. Some small revisions were made in December
1988. Aria is dedicated to my wife Ali for her help, support and
forbearance.
EQ is the third in a series of works featuring saxophones:
Q (1976) for soprano saxophone, string trio and electric
organ explores the musical implications of "cue" (a signal to begin
a musical event), "queue" (the players sit in a diagonal line across
the stage) and "Q" (the width of a tuneable band of frequencies -
in a filter, for example); SQ (1978-79) for saxophone
quartet addresses space and the theatricality of performance; EQ
(1980) for soprano saxophone and tape (perhaps more accurately described
as a tape piece with soprano saxophone obbligato) revisits some of
these concerns, particularly "cue" (the interaction of saxophone and
tape), "Q" (a sweeping filter can be heard producing melodic material
out of static harmony), spatial articulation and the physical and
theatrical aspects of performance. Also, "EQ" is studio slang for
"equalisation" - essentially sophisticated tone controls, and a fundamental
device for sound modificaton in the studio.
EQ was commissioned by John Harle with funds made
available by the Arts Council of Great Britain; the tape was made
in the studios of the University of York and City University, London.
It won First Prize in the Mixed Category of the 1981 Bourges
International Electroacoustic Awards and appeared on the Electrecord
label, performed by French saxophonist Daniel Kientzy.
It was re-recorded by Stephen Cottrell at The University of Birmingham
(assistant engineer: Alistair MacDonald) for a CD on the NMC label
(London).
This short work for string quartet won the Lloyds Bank National Composers'
Award in 1985 and was first performed that year in the Cornhill Festival
by the Bochmann String Quartet.
Blocks of strongly characterised material are juxtaposed in a
manner illustrative of the work's title. This polarisation is, however,
under scrutiny!
One of the principal source sounds for this work - balloons from children's
parties - gave rise to a train of thought which, after linking "toy"
balloons to "hot air" balloons, went on to draw in numerous other
concepts of air (breath, utterance, natural phenomena) and heat (energy,
action, danger).
As work on the sound material progressed, other notions of air
became important: motion through space; a certain fleeting quality;
and air as the principal medium for the transmission of sound. The
manner in which this happens (each air molecule vibrating about
its current position and passing its energy on to its neighbour
in alternating patterns of compression and rarefaction) became a
model for the structure of the piece itself - a free association
of sounds and references, each linking with and influencing its
neighbour. Gradually, the referential, mimetic and environmental
aspects of the piece revealed another, altogether more worrying
image: that of the inflated balloon as a metaphor of the fragility
of that very environment, of the Earth itself - capable of being
manipulated, but not infinitely so.
But beware! Danger! I run the risk of becoming too pompous, too
"inflated" with the importance of my theme. We should not forget
that, in colloquial English, if what someone says is "hot air",
it means it lacks real substance, is rubbish, meaningless, bluff,
all talk and no action, empty words...
Hot Air was commissioned by the Groupe
de Recherches Musicales and sound material was developed
using the GRM's Syter and GRM Tools systems; later stages in the
compositional process took place in the composer's studio and in
the Electroacoustic Music Studios of The University of Birmingham.
It is available on Articles
indéfinis, a Jonty Harrison "solo" CD on the empreintes
DIGITALes label (Montreal).
The title ("Klang" is the German for sound)
reflects the onomatopoeic nature of the family of sounds providing
the raw material for the piece - sharp, metallic attacks with interesting
resonances rich in harmonics. The real starting point for Klang
was the discovery of two earthenware casseroles, the sounds of which
were recorded in the Electroacoustic Music Studio of the University
of East Anglia during the summer of 1981. Material of two kinds was
recorded - attack/resonance sounds made by tapping the lids on or
in the bowls, and continuous rolling sounds made by running the lids
around the insides of the bowls. Different pitches resulted from the
various combinations of lids and bowls, and different qualities of
resonance emerged according to the attack position. The microphones
were placed very close to the bowls to maximise the movement within
the stereophonic image. Other related material, accumulated over the
previous three or four years, was also used. This included both "concrete"
sounds, such as cow-bells, metal rods and aluminium bars, and electronically
generated sounds, both analogue and digital. The final impetus to
compose the piece came in June 1981 when the composer was invited
by Janos Decsenyi of Magyar Radio to work in the Radio's Electronic
Music Studio in Budapest. As studio time would be limited he was advised
to take a certain amount of taped material with him; the two weeks
prior to the visit were therefore spent in preliminary work in
the Electroacoustic Music Studio of The University of Birmingham.
Most of the opening two sections of the piece were composed before
going to Hungary.
Although continuous, Klang falls into six short,
fairly clearly defined sections:-
- Introduction
- Development 1 - duet
- Development 2 - interruption of duet and increase in complexity
towards the first climax
- Development 3 - relatively static section
- Development 4 - proliferation of material from Development 3
into glissando structures; build-up to the second
- (main) climax, and slow release to:
- Coda
The listener can trace the development of the material from raw
statements of casserole sounds in the Introduction, through more
complex, highly transformed events in the four Development sections,
back to the opening sound-world in the Coda. The most obvious transformation
technique is mixing, using only slightly transposed versions of
simple sounds. Besides mixing and transposition with tape recorders
and a harmoniser, the main modifications were achieved by filtering
and, most important of all, montage. This last technique is the
principal means of controlling the timing and rhythmic articulation
of the material and its organisation into phrases (which may be
a single line or a mix of many layers which are edited together
into the desired sequence).
Klang was commissioned by
MAFILM and composed in the Electronic Music Studio of Magyar Radio
in 1982. It was awarded Second Prize in the Analogue Category of
the Bourges International Electroacoustic
Music Awards in 1983. It has been performed and broadcast in many
parts of the world, including at the 1984 ISCM World Music Days
in Toronto, Canada. It appeared on the UEA record label and has
just been released on CD on the NMC label (London). In 1992 it was
awarded a Euphonie d'or at Bourges
as one of the twenty most significant works from two decades
of the Bourges Awards.
Douglas Doherty/Jonty Harrison
Lament was composed in response to a joint commission
from BRMB Radio in Birmingham and Radio Clyde, and was subsequently
part of the Independent Broadcasting Authority's submission for
the music section of the Prix Italia in 1985.
Bearing in mind the radio listener who might tune in by chance
to the piece, we decided to utilise "everyday" sounds (which would
have the advantage of being immediately recognisable) to attract
the attention, but to compose these sounds musically. Thus whilst
the musical content at first seems anecdotal, the structure and
context are musical, giving rise to a work which can be interpreted
on a variety of levels. The linking factor in this process is the
notion of time - a prime concern of all composers (composition can,
after all, be viewed as the organisation of time - and hence its
"mastery" - by means of sound), here made explicit by many "poetic"
references to it : ticking clocks, counting, "the river of time"
(along with some borrowings from Hermann Hesse), etc - clichés,
every one of them!
Lament was composed in
the Electroacoustic Music Studios of The University of Birmingham,
with additional material from the Electroacoustic Music Studio at
the University of Newcastle. Thanks are due to several people who
contributed to the making of the piece: Brian Savin of BRMB, Alison
Warne, Jan Smaczny, Geoffrey Warne, Jane Alderton, Sarah Griffin
and John Whenham.
Lament received a Mention in the 1986 Bourges International Electroacoustic
Awards.
- for Ali
Ottone (Italian for brass)
begins - literally - where my earlier piece for brass quintet, Sons
transmutants/sans transmutant, leaves off. The throbbing sound of
pulsed air is now expanded by electroacoustic means, heralding a
deeper exploration of the timbral/spectral world of brass instruments
than can be achieved purely acoustically. The ability of the electroacoustic
medium to examine sounds at very close quarters, to "get inside"
and deconstruct individual instrumental sound objects is here exploited
to create a larger-scale work lasting almost twenty minutes.
The timbral extensions, which range from transformations of "straight"
brass sounds to the sounds of creaking doors, squeaking balloons,
my younger daughter and spinning coins ("brass" is a slang term
for "money" in the North of England!) stay in the domain of the
tape "part", with the live performers rarely venturing far from
"normal" playing techniques. At various points, "windows" are created,
through which reminiscences of Sons transmutants/sans transmutant
can be clearly heard, and there are some significant moments, particularly
towards the end of the work, in which the tape becomes overtly instrumental.
Overall, Ottone moves in a
kind of orbit around the nucleus of the brass quintet, a tendency
underlined by the spatial dimension of the work: the players are
required to move to different locations in the hall for certain
sections, emphasising the changing relationships between the components
of the ensemble, and approaching (albeit in a fairly rudimentary
way) the ability of the electroacoustic medium (especially in diffusion)
to exploit spatial considerations to the full.
Ottone was commissioned by
the Fine Arts Brass Ensemble, with funds made available by West
Midlands Arts. It was composed between January and May 1992 and
the tape was made in
the Electroacoustic Music Studios of The University of Birmingham.
It was first performed in the Adrian Boult Hall, Birmingham in November
1992, conducted by the composer. I am grateful to Dr Andrew Lewis
for his assistance during the making of the tape and for diffusing
the tape at the premiere. Ottone was selected for performance at
the 1993 International Computer Music Conference in Tokyo, Japan
and has been recorded by the Fine Arts Brass Ensemble for CD release
on the Merlin label.
Pair (even) - the balance between opposites (left/right, high/low,
dry/resonant); equilibrium; the concept of stasis.
Impair (odd) - the contradiction of pair; the element of imbalance
which carries us out of stasis; the dynamic concept.
Pair/Impair - an extension of the relationship between dynamic
and static musics (and their confusion) - a relationship which in
itself can fluctuate between the dynamic and the static.
Pair/Impair was composed in 1978 in the Recording and Electronic
Music Studio of the University of East Anglia. It received a Mention
in the Analogue Category of the 1980 Bourges International Electroacoustic
Music Awards.
BEAST (Jonty Harrison, Andrew Lewis, Dan Rodger, with additional material
by Robert Dow and Alistair MacDonald)
PulseRates was commissioned by Birmingham City Council to celebrate
Sounds like Birmingham - UK City of Music 1992. The piece grows
out of sounds which can be heard in the city of Birmingham itself
(the fish market, New Street station, city buses and their brakes,
the hammering and drilling from building sites), which intermingle
with more overtly "musical" sounds (ranging from the sounds of actual
percussion instruments to a more avant-garde electroacoustic sound-world,
from a texture reminiscent of "ambient acid house" to something
more akin to a "systems" piece).
In the electroacoustic medium, composers and listeners are uniquely
able to move between "real", "unreal" and "surreal" sonic environments.
All three are present in PulseRates, the organisation of which,
though primarily musical, can also be interpreted programmatically:
just as the city's industrial past provided the foundations for
the communities living here, so the sound of machinery of all kinds,
symbolising the energy of this industrial past, provides the foundations
of PulseRates; in the course of the work it is transformed into
the cultural (and multi-cultural) energy which has so strongly come
to symbolise Birmingham in the late twentieth century.
BEAST wishes to thank the following individuals and organisations
for their help in making this work possible: Selwyn van Zeller of
the Museum of Science and Technology; Lucas Aerospace Ltd; Westley
Richards & Co. Ltd; The University of Birmingham; Anthony Sargent
and Catherine Manners of Birmingham City Council.
For the tourist, Notre Dame de Chartres may
be just one more "sight" among the Gothic cathedrals of northern France,
perhaps only notable for having more of its original medieval glass
than most of the others. But why are the three rosaces (rose windows)
at Chartres considered by experts to be among
the four greatest ever produced? Why is the building more than 46º
off the normal east-west orientation for a medieval church? Why are
there no sculptures and no graves within the building? And how was
a relatively small community able to erect, in only twenty-six years
and with no interruptions, a cathedral with the widest known gothic
vault, when work on cathedrals in wealthier cities was interrupted
for lack of funds? Could it be that the outward beauty and perfection
of the building are the result of something else, something hidden...?
Rosaces 4 (1982) was commissioned by Elms
Concerts with funds made available by the Arts Council of Great
Britain. The tape was made in
the Electroacoustic Music Studio of The University of Birmingham.
Sorties was written as part of Web, a collaboration
between seven BEAST composers and graphic artist Lorne Christie. Web
is a "sound sculpture" - a walk-through installation in an open-sided
canalside warehouse. The work evokes images of the elements (air,
earth, fire and water) and of a journey - enhanced in this case by
the movement of the audience through a continuously varying visual
and sonic landscape.
This idea of travelling from one sonic location to another underpins
the evolution of Sorties which, as well as forming part of Web,
was designed as an independent work. As the title suggests, the
primary sound image is that of leaving (exiting, escaping, fleeing)
an interior space for an exterior one, only to find that one is
mysteriously and inevitably trapped once again in another "interior".
The ultimate impossibility of escape is reflected in the predominantly
dark and brooding atmosphere of the work.
Web was commissioned by the BBC and Birmingham City Council, as
part of the BBC's Music Live '95 Festival and performed during May
1995. Sorties was awarded a Prize in the Programme Music Category
of the 1996 Bourges International Electroacoustic Music Awards.
I had wanted for some time to compose a "French suite", rather in
the manner of the musique concrète tradition.
Sounds from some rough-textured wine glasses, which had been transformed
in the Studio Numérique of the Groupe
de Recherches Musicales in Paris using predominantly time-domain
manipulation (ETIR), brassage (BRAGE and BRAGGE)
and spatialisation programs, provided a promising starting point.
These individual sounds were onwardly transformed in
the Electroacoustic Music Studios of The University of Birmingham,
using a variety of digital signal processors (Publison, Yamaha, AKG),
combined with a number of other sound sources, further transformed,
recombined...and so on.
I ventured into this pool of material from time to time in order
to compose short, essentially self-contained movements. The reassembling
of new, specific musical utterances from the same source material
led to the idea that, by analogy, complete movements (which would
inevitably contain a plethora of cross-references) could be assembled
in various ways to create pieces of different lengths and pacings
for different occasions, spaces...and so on.
Over a dozen movements have been composed to date. Their different
functions are characterised, to continue the link with the musique
concrète suite, by French titles: à
propos and résumé are, respectively, expository
and recapitulatory statements of the basic array of sound-types
found in the work, and the longest and most elaborate movements
are designated commentaire; the first version of the work (Version
Bourges 1990) contained only these movement categories. From 1991,
with access to a Sound Tools system, I was able to achieve the seamless
continuity of material needed for the family of gentler, more reflective
and static movements which offset them. These interspersed movements
are grouped under the general heading of (parenthèse),
though some carry additional, descriptive titles such as réflexion,
résonance and souffle
d'insectes .
The CD version (prepared for
Articles indéfinis on the empreintes
DIGITALes label, Montreal, and itself a revision of the Birmingham
Version 1992) has eleven movements, whose durations range from 40
seconds to nearly 4 minutes:-
- à propos
- (parenthèse 1)
- commentaire 1
- (parenthèse 2)
- réflexion
- commentaire 2
- souffle d'insectes (parenthèse 3)
- résonance (parenthèse 4)
- résumé
- (parenthèse 5)
- commentaire 3
A characteristic of this version is the overlapping of movements
(movements 6 to 9 form a continuous whole, as do the final two movements),
emphasising the more dramatic potential of the material. Overall,
however, the work is not a vehicle for a dynamic or dramatic musical
argument; I am more concerned to create a network of connections
within a sound-world more conducive to dalliance than discourse.
One of the main criteria in Pierre Schaeffer's
definition of the "sound object" was that, through the process of
"reduced listening", one should hear sound material purely as sound,
divorced from any associations with its physical origins - in other
words, what is significant about a recorded violin sound (for example)
is that particular sound, its unique identity, and not its "violin-ness".
Despite this ideal, a rich repertoire of music has been created since
the 1950s which plays precisely on the ambiguities evoked when recognition
and contextualisation of sound material rub shoulders with more abstracted
(and abstract) musical structures. But as these structures should
themselves be organically related to the peculiarities of individual
sound objects within them, the ambiguity is compounded: interconnections
and multiple levels of meaning proliferate. The known becomes strange
and the unknown familiar in a continuum of reality, unreality and
surreality, where boundaries shift and continually renewed definitions
are the only constant...
Unsound Objects was commissioned by the International Computer
Music Association and first performed at the 1995 International
Computer Music Conference in Banff, Alberta, Canada. Along with
four other tape works, it is available on
Articles indéfinis, a Jonty Harrison
"solo" CD on the empreintes DIGITALes label
(Montreal), and a further revision (1996) will shortly appear as
part of the CDCM collection on Centaur.
|