AFRICAN
PENTECOSTALISM AND THE ANCESTORS:
CONFRONTATION
OR COMPROMISE?
Introduction
Much
of the information presented in this paper was gathered during field research in
Soshanguve, Pretoria between 1990 and 1992. The
research consisted of a preliminary quantitative survey conducted between October 1990 and
April 1991 in which 1638 families were interviewed. Since
that time, in-depth interviews with members of defined churches has formed the basis of
the qualitative research that is reflected in this paper.
This discussion of traditional religious concepts is based on these conversations
with church members, people who professed to be Christians.
92,4% of the population of Soshanguve were members of Christian churches (Anderson
1992a:64). In my publication, BAZALWANE:
African Pentecostals in South Africa (Anderson 1992a), the research was described and
some of the preliminary results tabulated. There
I also defined the terms I shall be using here (1992a:7-12).
The
term 'African Pentecostalism' is used very broadly to include in the first place
'Pentecostal mission churches', churches started by white Pentecostal missionaries in the
early twentieth century and still generally under white influence or domination, the
largest being the Apostolic Faith Mission and the Assemblies of God. Secondly, the term includes 'independent
Pentecostal churches', independent black churches founded by Blacks within the last twenty
years, an example being the Grace Bible Church in Soweto.
Thirdly, I suggested that 'African Pentecostalism' should also include 'indigenous
Pentecostal-type churches', numerically the most significant, referring to those African
indigenous churches who have historical, theological and liturgical links with the
Pentecostal movement (Anderson 1992a:28-31), and who, like the Pentecostals, emphasise the
power and manifestations of the Holy Spirit in the church.
Examples of these churches are the Zion Christian Church (hereafter ZCC) and the
Saint John Apostolic Faith Mission. We
identified 145 of these churches in Soshanguve (Anderson 1992a:122-125), accounting for
about 32% of the population. Taken together,
the African Pentecostals accounted for some 41% of the black population, a proportion that
appears to be steadily rising, to such an extent that it has become 'the major
force to be reckoned with in South African Christianity' (Anderson 1992b:253).
For
the purposes of understanding how this central traditional concept is dealt with in
African Pentecostal churches, it is necessary first to grasp something of how ancestors
are perceived in Africa.[i]
Ancestors
and their veneration
The
ancestors are believed to be those who have died, who exist in some usually undefined and
unknown place to which the living have no access. There
they look after their descendants' welfare, and expect their cooperation in return. They have power to both help and harm their wards
- although most people in our research believed that the ancestors' function was to help
and not to harm their families. Several
of our respondents felt quite strongly that the ancestors never harm their wards; they are
only there to help them and protect them. They
only passively bring harm, by withdrawing their protection when their instructions have
not been carried out. The ancestor cult is a
family affair; and members of a particular family usually observe the family customs
relating to their particular ancestors, at least once annually. Not every deceased family member becomes an
ancestor. One man told us that ancestors are
only those who are especially chosen to belong to the group of ancestors. Both his parents had died; but only his mother was
an ancestor. He knew this because she was the
only one who appeared to the family.
Ancestors
reveal themselves mostly through dreams, but also less frequently through (day) visions
and through diviners. One respondent, in an
interesting example of 'cultural schizophrenia', said that when the ancestors appeared to
him in dreams it was 'as clear as television', and not like an 'ordinary dream'. It seems that a manifestation of an ancestor will
be an unusually vivid dream. Ancestors will
usually identify themselves in some way, either by stating their name in the dream, or by
showing some characteristic which will enable someone who remembers them to identify them. One respondent said that in 1986 she had a dream
in which she saw she was pregnant. Someone
took her to a big stone (probably a gravestone) on which was written the name 'Isaac'. The following day she enquired from an older
family member, who said that Isaac was a grandfather who had died many years previously. A month later the respondent fell pregnant, and a
baby boy was born who she had to call Isaac. She
then prayed and thanked the ancestors for their gift of the child. The child thereby, following traditional custom,
received the 'ancestor spirit' of the deceased ancestor Isaac.
Ancestors
can be angered, and thereby can bring calamity to their descendants, especially when their
instructions are not carried out. Because
they are 'parents', they have the responsibility to discipline their 'children' when they
are disobedient. One respondent in our survey
told us that when his cousin was knocked down by a motor vehicle, the family visited a
diviner to discover the reason for this disaster. They
were told that the cousin had not carried out the 'rules' of the ancestors as revealed in
a dream, and that this was why the accident had occurred.
Similarly, another informant said that a diviner had told his brother that the
ancestors wanted to kill him for failing to carry out their instructions. He was indeed thereafter knocked down by a car and
killed. The informant, a ZCC member,
fervently believed that the ancestors had the power to kill people, their children, or
their livestock, when they were not obeyed.
The
ancestors were responsible for the violence that had swept South Africa, said one
informant, for they were angry that they were being neglected or ignored by the young
people. She said that in the 'old days' when
the ancestors were properly respected there was no killing.
Several respondents referred to the visit of Mr Nelson Mandela to his ancestral
home in the Transkei after he was released from prison in 1990. The fact that he had supposedly paid homage to his
ancestors was the reason why things were going so well for him, and his 'power' was
increasing. This is how one respondent put
it:
When
Mr Nelson Mandela was released from prison, he went back to his birth place to tell the
ancestors that he was released from prison, and was now on a mission to liberate our
country. All the blessings and the changes
which are coming to us with him are because the ancestors are backing him and helping him.
One
ZCC respondent alluded to the prosperity that is brought to people who respect the
ancestors. When things were not going well in
his life, he visited a prophet who told him that the ancestors were angry and should be
appeased. The prophet thereupon slaughtered a
chicken, prayed, and offered the bird to the ancestors.
The respondent attributed his success since that time to that event, which had
changed his life. He was now the owner of a
shop and a car; and he no longer had 'family problems'.
As a result he continued to do whatever the ancestors told him to do.
The
ancestors must be appeased with gifts, such as the ritual killing of a cow, a goat or a
chicken, a dish of porridge, the pouring out of a libation of sorghum beer, and other
rituals as demanded by the ancestors themselves. Most
people seemed to acknowledge that the ancestors did not actually consume the offering that
was given them. One respondent had an
interesting theory: when the meat was cooked or burnt, the smoke rose to heaven to become
food for the ancestors. The ancestors' graves
must be well looked after; and today it is very important to erect a tombstone in the
departed's honour, for this will help to perpetuate the deceased's memory. People also speak with the ancestors at the
graves, asking for help when they are troubled, and leaving behind a gift of food.
One
man related two interesting incidents in his experience.
His mother appeared to him in a dream some time after her death. She said that she was getting cold at the
graveyard and needed her blanket. The family
did not understand what this meant; so they went to ask a prophet. He told them that their mother needed a tombstone. They erected the tombstone, and the result was
that the mother did not 'trouble' the family any longer.
The second incident involved the man's maternal grandfather. After he died, the family had slaughtered a cow in
his honour in keeping with traditional customs, and the people at the funeral had eaten
it. Later he appeared in a dream asking
where his blanket was. Once again, the family
consulted the prophet, for they were members of an indigenous Apostolic church. This time the prophet said that the grandfather
was looking for the hide of the cow slaughtered during his funeral. The problem was that the hide had by that time
been destroyed. The man related how the
grandfather continued to trouble the family with sickness and other difficulties. They decided to buy another cow, which they
ritually killed, and then they put the skin in the room where the grandfather used to
sleep. 'In that way we satisfied him', the
man concluded, 'and he did not trouble us any more'.
People
are also sometimes instructed to go to the ancestors' graves and consult with them there. When all these various things are done it is
believed that the offerer will live peacefully and will prosper. One respondent said that one day while she was
sitting in the kitchen, she saw a white goat in a vision on the wall. She told her husband when he returned from work;
and he said that it meant that they should kill a goat for the ancestors, which they did. Another respondent told of an occasion when her
grandfather appeared to her. He came through
the door of the room, and then stood next to her crying, saying that he was not satisfied
with the family's behaviour towards him. The
next morning she told her husband what had happened.
At first he was somewhat sceptical; but he believed her when he received the same
appearance during the following night. They
had to make a ritual killing of a cow, and erect a tombstone for the grandfather. The respondent said that the grandfather was
satisfied by this; for he had not appeared again since.
The
importance of the ancestor cult
The
ancestor cult is the central feature of African religion, the heart of the African spirit
world. It is not an outmoded belief which is
dying out in South Africa's urban areas. The
veneration of ancestors is still widely practised in the black townships of South Africa;
although the incidence of the ancestor cult among church members is not as high today as
it was thirty years ago. Wherever we
approached the subject of ancestors in Soshanguve, there was usually lively discussion. For a great many urban black people the ancestors
are a reality, to be given due acknowledgement and to whom recourse is had for the
provision of felt needs. Many respondents
said that the ancestors were the benevolent guardians and protectors of people. One respondent said that even God was unable to do
anything without the ancestors. Another said
that a person could not pray to God without mentioning the ancestors; they were the
mediators who would make the prayer successful. They
were able to give a person power to pray to God.
The
diviners, the specialists in traditional religion, will often direct the afflicted to the
spirit world, instructing them to give attention to the ancestor cult in order to resolve
their problems. Perhaps an ancestor feels
neglected, and his surviving family has not fulfilled its traditional responsibilities. Usually the ancestor is viewed as nearer to God
than living relatives are. One respondent
told us that the ancestors were mediators between people and God, that they were God's
helpers, and that they reveal God's will to people.
When people want to speak to God they should go through the ancestors, he said. Fundamentally, the supreme being is unpredictable
and for the most part unknown, and no relationship exists with him. The ancestors, however, are known; and the strong
community and family relationships are unaffected by death.
But
the ancestors are not the ultimate solution for the traditional African. It seems (at least from my theological
perspective) that they tend to be unreliable, malignant, unpredictable and fickle -
although in the perceptions of many Africans the ancestors are also caring, protective and
concerned. They can demand more than people
are willing to give, or else they do not always make their desires clearly known. Sometimes adversity will suddenly strike a family,
and they will need to know which particular ancestor or other living person caused
that adversity, and why. The answers to these
perplexing questions are paramount, since without them the adversity will not go away. The family needs to know what it must do to
appease the offended ancestor. This is when
they will turn to the diviners for solutions to these and other vexing questions.
Both
Daneel (1973:54) in Zimbabwe and Pauw (1975:205) in the Eastern Cape demonstrated the
strong support for the ancestor cult among African people belonging to mission churches in
the communities they surveyed. There is some
indication that this support has waned to a certain extent since these surveys were
conducted in the 1960s. In our research the
belief in the ancestor cult was held by a little less than half (44%) of our 1638
preliminary survey respondents, which was, nevertheless, a significant proportion.
Pentecostals
and the ancestor cult
Members
of urban Pentecostal mission churches and independent Pentecostal churches (constituting
9% of the total population) were generally unqualified and unanimous in their rejection of
the ancestor cult and all the rituals associated with it.
The ancestors are believed to exist, but Christians do not need to do anything
about them or to make ritual killings for them, because they have no power over
Christians. All but five of the 140
Pentecostals interviewed in our preliminary survey (97%) said that they were opposed to
the practice of ritual killing. 132 (95%)
said that they did not reverence the ancestors; and 134 (96%) said that they did not
consult diviners. This indicates that it is
the only grouping of black churches in South Africa which has almost totally rejected
these traditional religious practices. It
displays a radical break with what they regard as 'pagan' practices. Pentecostals were quite sure that a person who is
'saved' does not do these things. They
represent the 'old life' out of which everything has become new. In this respect there is a marked contrast to most
other types of church in Soshanguve. Pentecostals
are more forthright in their rejection of those traditional practices which they see as
incompatible with their Christianity, than the members of other church types are. Our research indicated that only 4% of the
Pentecostals interviewed practised the ancestor cult in any way, compared to 43% in the
mission churches, 54% in the indigenous Pentecostal-type churches, and 68% in the
indigenous Ethiopian-type churches.[ii]
These
figures suggest that the gap between members of Pentecostal churches and members of
indigenous Pentecostal-type churches is wider than it appears on the surface. Western Christianity has definitely influenced the
Pentecostals in a much greater way. The
Pentecostal-type church members, who are less doctrine oriented and less inhibited to
discuss ancestors than Pentecostals are, have a greater awareness of the African spirit
world and therefore may be making a greater contribution to contextualisation in this
respect. A black theologian once said in a
personal interview that in actual practice the Pentecostal rejection of the ancestor cult
was ambivalent, and that it was very difficult for anyone to be disentangled from social
practices connected with the ancestor cult, without separating oneself from being an
African. My impression is that many African
Pentecostals have in fact done just that - and it is highly unlikely that they would admit
to having denied their Africaness.
A
well informed member of the Apostolic Faith Mission, obviously a sincere Christian who
knew the Bible well, said the following:
I
personally do not venerate the ancestors, but I believe that ancestors are there. Ancestors do exist; they are people who have
fallen asleep. Before I was saved I used to
venerate them; and I know what they can do in the life of a person. You really can become a slave of the ancestors.
Even the Bible acknowledges that there are 'gods' and that we should not worship any other
gods but our Father in heaven. They do have
the power to help or harm you - that I saw when I was not yet saved... when I did what I
was instructed, such as slaughtering a goat, then I saw things definitely improving. They have the power to harm you if you do not
follow their instructions; and they have the power to help you if you follow them.... I
believe that if people knew the power of the gospel they would not have anything to do
with the ancestors. But because they are
bound by the devil they are still in darkness. They
go up and down buying goats, slaughtering cows - and nothing seems to come right. So if only people could know the power of the
gospel and believe in Jesus Christ, they could be set free... now that they are still in
darkness they must do as the devil commands them.
There
seems to be ambiguity in the attitudes of some African Pentecostals to the ancestors. In the preceding interview, the ancestor cult was
rejected. This practice belonged to the old
life, to the darkness, to a person without Jesus Christ.
But at the same time the ancestors were acknowledged as a reality. This respondent, however, seemed to equate the
ancestors with the devil, for people needed to be set free from the darkness so that they
would no longer obey the instructions of the devil. Another
Apostolic Faith Mission member said that to have communication with the ancestors was
against the Bible, which taught that there was to be no contact between the living and the
dead. A member of the Full Gospel Church said
that before she became a Christian, she would go to the graveyard whenever things were not
going well. This is how she described her
experience of ancestors:
I
used to go to the graveyard and kneel there and speak to my ancestors asking for help. I would bring food so that they could eat and then
rest. At that time I was ignorant of the fact
that only God could save my life. I was lost
like a blind woman, believing that there were ancestors.
But now, since I am saved, I have nothing to do with these ancestors, and I do not
believe in them any more.
Many
Pentecostals identified ancestors as demonic. A
member of an independent Pentecostal church said bluntly that ancestors were 'evil
spirits'. 'The devil is able to disguise
himself in the form of a person who died long ago,' he explained. 'He pretends as if he has come to help and protect
you, while all the time the ancestor is the devil himself'.
Another Pentecostal woman said that although ancestors existed, they were 'idols'. She thought that the ancestors were unfair,
because they helped or harmed a person at will without warning. A member of the Apostolic Faith Mission said that
she did not believe in ancestors, because they were in fact evil spirits. The wife of an independent Pentecostal pastor
said: 'Ancestors are evil spirits. Satan is
able to change these spirits so that they resemble your parents who have died. He will tell you, "These are your
parents", and you will believe that.' Similarly,
a member of an independent Pentecostal church said: 'Ancestors are evil spirits that come
in the form of our grandparents. This is the
devil's trick so that we can worship them instead of worshipping God. They help some, and make many others suffer'.
Another
Pentecostal was also opposed to the ancestor cult:
Ancestors
are our forefathers who are asleep; they will wake up one day. We should honour our
parents while they are still alive, not after they have died. They manifest themselves through demons, and
through the diviners who will tell you that your ancestor is instructing you to do this or
that.
The
general reaction of Pentecostal people to the questions on ancestors, therefore, was that
ancestors were powerless in Christians' lives, and that they were evil spirits who should
be rejected.
The
ancestor cult and indigenous churches
As
far as the indigenous Pentecostal-type churches are concerned, there generally appears to
be more ambiguity than there is in the case of Pentecostals. In these churches there is a wide spectrum of
opinion regarding the ancestors. Sometimes
there was evidence of confrontation between a person's Christian faith and the ancestor
cult. We came across outright rejection of
the ancestors on the part of some Pentecostal-type members.
Like many Pentecostals, they said forthrightly that the so-called ancestors were
'demons'. The Bible said that we should not
worship or obey them, they said. One
respondent, a member of the Philippian Apostolic Church in Zion said that although she
could attend any church service, she would definitely not go to a church 'where ancestors
are worshipped'. But at the same time,
several respondents also said that people were free to believe in ancestors and to observe
the ancestor rituals if they chose to. Many
Pentecostal-type church members said that they did not believe in ancestors, that the
ancestors had no powers; and some said that ancestors were demons. A member of the Christian Apostolic Church in
Zion, for example, had a similar opinion to those of the Pentecostals noted above when he
said: 'Ancestors are the spirits of Satan who come in the form of one of our dead
parents'. Two different Pentecostal-type
church respondents said, with irony, that it was pointless slaughtering animals for the
ancestors, as they were dead and could not eat the meat - only the living could eat. A member of St Matthew's Apostolic Faith Church
said that she believed in ancestors before she was 'saved'.
She went on to say: 'They cannot harm a child of God. We do not need to do anything for them, because
they are dead. They can only enslave a
person'. We also came across several people,
particularly younger members of these churches who clearly knew nothing at all (or very
little) about the ancestor cult or about traditional religion generally. Some said they had never prayed or made ritual
killings to ancestors in their lives, and they did not know whether ancestors could help
or harm people. Others said that they did
not know whether the ancestors existed; they had merely heard other people talk about
them. Some said that this did not concern
them at all, for they knew that God was the only one who could really help them when in
trouble. In this respect, we must remember
that even traditionally, the youth are excluded from ritual participation. As they grow older, and are included in
traditional observations, they begin to assimilate traditional religious values. This may also be a reason for the ignorance of
some young people concerning ancestors.
We
did not encounter the same strong support for the ancestor cult that has been described by other researchers (e g
Pauw 1960:161; 1975:302; West 1975:37). And
yet, many of the members of these churches were still practising ancestor rituals. One of the South African indigenous church
leaders, Archbishop Mhlope of the Christian National Apostolic Church in Zion, said
'Whoever forsakes his ancestors is also forsaken by his ancestors and he becomes an easy
prey to diseases and to all his other enemies' (ICT 1985:17-18). Elsewhere, the same document (1985:24) said that
'the customary way of commemorating and making contact with the spirits of our ancestors
is a family affair, not a religious service... in most cases our leaders do encourage the
commemoration of our ancestors in our homes'. West
(1975:29) noted among some of the churches in Soweto that he surveyed that 'the question
of the shades' was 'a personal matter for individuals, and of no importance to the
church'. (This, in fact, is also often the
view of African theologians.) Several of the
prophet-healers interviewed by West admitted that their power came from God through the
ancestors (:117). Makhubu (1988:60), an
indigenous church leader, said that 'most of the African Independent Churches honour and
respect ancestors. This is something that is
deeply rooted in African people'. The Zulu
Nazarite leader Shembe had also 'given a place to the ancestral spirits in his system of
theology... In his church, the dead are entitled to veneration, and commemoration services
are held in their honour' (Vilakazi 1986:76).
A
few of the robed Apostolics in Soshanguve were in favour of the preservation of the
ancestor cult. The Saint John Apostolic Faith
Mission was one of the more accommodating churches to traditional practices that we found
among Pentecostal-type churches generally. Over
half of the members made ritual killings for the ancestors, and 76% of the members revered
ancestors. One St John member said that it
was important for people to pray to the ancestors, to keep their graves clean and watered,
and to unveil tombstones in their honour. Other
Apostolics were also favourably disposed to the ancestors, like the member of the Saviour
Apostolic Church who said that ancestors could heal sicknesses which no-one else could
heal. 'They bring good luck' she said. 'If you do not do what they want, you will be in
trouble'. A member of the St Paul Apostolic
Church said that people should make ritual killings to the ancestors, which was actually
practised in her church. Another member of
the same church said that people must do exactly what the ancestors said. A member of the St Paul Spiritual Church of God
said that it was right to sacrifice for the ancestors, because people in the Bible used to
make sacrifices. This was also the view of a
member of the Christian Catholic Apostolic Holy Spirit Church in Zion. A member of the Apostolic Christian Church in Zion
reflected the ambivalence in the minds of some church members, when she said that the
Bible taught us that there should be no communication between the living and the dead. She went on to say that just as Nehemiah asked the
king's permission to go and restore the tombstones of the Jewish forefathers, so we should
honour our ancestors. Another member said
that when his family went to the graveyard to pray, the ancestors helped his younger
brother who had been sick. It was important
to go to the grave with some snuff, or maize meal, or some other gift for the ancestors,
he said, but that Christians should not make ritual killings for them. It appears that for some members there is a
qualified acceptance of ancestor veneration. In
this last instance there was a desire to measure any practice against biblical norms.
Some
respondents made attempts to provide theological justification for the observance of the
ancestor cult, although the 'communion of the saints' idea of African theology did not
feature at all in our interviews. One
respondent told us that the ancestors revealed the Word of God to her, so that she could
prophesy. Another informant said that the
ancestors were angels who had embodied themselves in one of your relatives who had died. Another said that the ancestors were the great
cloud of witnesses in Hebrews 12, who were looking at how people were living their lives. Whenever people did wrong things they were angry
and disturbed. She gave Scriptural examples
of the appearance of ancestors: when Moses and Elijah appeared with Christ on the Mount of
Transfiguration, and when Samuel appeared to Saul when the latter visited the witch of
Endor. People needed, therefore, to do what
the ancestors instructed them to do.
Frederick
Modise of the International Pentecost Church (Anderson 1992c:186-200) and his ministers
officially confront the ancestor cult. This
church (hereafter IPC) has effectively reduced dependence on ancestors in the lives of
many of its members. In a service attended by
our field worker in the IPC headquarters at Silo (Zuurbekom), Modise said that ancestors
are an abomination to God; another preacher said that ancestors were 'angels of Satan'. Modise told me in a personal interview that he
did not believe in what he called 'idols' and 'superstitions', referring not only to
ancestors and traditional charms and medicines, but also to symbolic healing methods
prescribed by ZCC and other indigenous Pentecostal-type church prophets and healers. This is also propagated in the church newsletter Star
of Silo. In the first issue, a picture of
Modise's house in Soweto is followed by a comment on what happened after his discharge
from hospital in October 1962:
He
removed from his house all medicine conventional or unconventional. All symbols related to traditional and ancestory
[sic] worship were thrown out of the house. Idolatory
[sic] symbols in the form of holy water, holy ash and strings were thrown out of the
house. What he remained with was his trust,
faith, hope and belief in his new found God and the world order and the civilization he
had to implement.
In
keeping with this official view, several different IPC members said that ancestors were
the 'angels of Satan' and 'evil spirits'; they were no help to people at all, as their
only function was to bring sickness and trouble, to harm and destroy. Another member said that he did not believe in the
existence of ancestors, because ancestors were people who worked with diviners. Ancestors would only reveal themselves to those
people who believed in them, he said, and this would be through the agency of the
diviners. Another member said that the dead
were resting; and that therefore the 'ancestors' were not ancestors at all, but were 'the
devil's angels'. It was, however, clear that
for some IPC members beliefs in the ancestors were still strong and unaffected by their
church's official stance in this regard.
The
Zion Christian Church and the ancestor cult
There
has been a tendency among researchers to describe the ZCC in South Africa as accommodating
the ancestor cult - although Daneel did not find this
to be true of the ZCC in Zimbabwe. Lukhaimane
(1980:51) said that the ZCC 'did not restrict its members from making sacrifices to their
ancestors'. This comment was valid for some
of the ZCC members we encountered, who felt that it was important to make ritual killings. A ZCC minister said that as the ancestors were
mediators between people and God, they had to be obeyed.
We should pray to the ancestors so that they could speak to God on our behalf, he
said. He also said that the ancestral spirit
that operated in a person could through baptism and prayer be converted into what he
called a 'church spirit', or the Spirit of God. This
is how he answered our question 'What are ancestors?':
Ancestors
are people who have died - but this does not mean that they have ceased to exist. They still continue living in another world. Now they have more power than we have. They can see all things that are happening to us,
because they are working very closely with God.... They are able to pray to God on our
behalf, and the things we ask of them they present to God.
I believe that they are people very much concerned about us and our lives.
Marie-Louise
Martin (1975:141) reflected the views of earlier researchers who considered there to be
confusion between the ancestors and the Holy Spirit in indigenous churches. Referring to the ZCC, she stated:
In
such syncretistic groups the Spirit of God is confused, or identified, with the ancestral
spirits, for both can manifest themselves through a certain specially-chosen medium and
both can occasion ecstasy.
We
did not, however, find such confusion between these two diametrically opposite concepts
amongst the majority of ZCC members interviewed. In
our survey, 73% of 168 ZCC members interviewed said that they did not make ritual killings
for the ancestors. When the same 168 people
were asked whether church members reverence the ancestors, 97 (58%) said that they
did not, whilst 66 (39%) said that they did. The
remaining 3% were uncertain. This figure
shows more ambivalence; and our in-depth interviews with ZCC members showed that for many
ZCC people the ancestors still play an important role.
And
yet within the ZCC there are both extremes of opinion.
Some ZCC members said that the ancestors were demons who had nothing to do with
Christians, whilst others said that ancestors revealed themselves to the prophets, and
must be respected. ZCC members in South
Africa do not appear to universally confront the traditional beliefs about ancestors;
although they seem to have little need for ancestral rituals. The reason for this is mainly because the church,
and especially the prophetic therapy and prescriptions, provide the protection and
guidance formerly sought from the ancestors. Some
ZCC members told us that ZCC people did not venerate the ancestors at all; but this
opinion was by no means unanimous. The
research in Soshanguve shows that ZCC members are less in favour of the ancestor cult
(39%) than are Pentecostal-type church members generally (52%), and than the overall
population of the township (43%). This
indicates a preference for confrontation with the ancestor cult among the majority of ZCC
members (Anderson 1992c:251).
These
findings do not suggest that the ZCC is a syncretistic church, or one that does not
effectively deal with traditional beliefs conflicting with the Christian revelation. For many ZCC members this was not true at all. Several members we interviewed said that they did
not believe that it was right to observe ancestor rituals; some said they did not need
them. One ZCC woman said that she did not
believe in ancestors; her late mother had said that whatever she wanted to do for her she
should do while she was alive and not after she had died.
Another member said that as her parents who had passed away were Christians, and
did not reverence the ancestors, then there was no reason for her family to do so today. As far as she was concerned, the ancestors did not
exist. Although a much higher proportion of
ZCC members are positive about traditional practices than is the case with the Pentecostal
churches, they were still a minority. We have
evidence of a rejection by the ZCC of traditional practices that was also true of
Pentecostal-type churches (including the ZCC) in Zimbabwe (Daneel 1987:262) - although
there it seems to have been a sharper confrontation.
The reason for this may have something to do with the fact that indigenous churches
in Zimbabwe were more directly influenced by evangelical mission churches than they were
in South Africa.
In
my earlier book, Moya: the Holy Spirit in an African context (Anderson 1991:87) I
suggested that for many Pentecostal-type churches contact with the ancestors is rejected,
while for others there is a far more tolerant and ambivalent attitude to the ancestor
cult. This latter attitude does not seem to
be true of most ZCC members. Our research
shows that the majority of the members of this church reject ancestor veneration by
Christians.
Christian
responses to ancestors
Generalisations
about the beliefs and attitudes of the African Pentecostal churches with regard to
ancestors must not give the impression of finality and conclusiveness, especially when
dealing with such a dynamic and constantly changing church movement. It is clearly important for Christians who want to
be relevant in Africa to respond somehow to the objective reality of ancestors,
traditionally believed to be the guardians and protectors of their surviving families, and
still revered by many urban Blacks in South Africa. We
have seen that the African Pentecostal churches have responded to the reality of the
ancestor cult in two contrasting and antithetical ways.
The
most frequent response is that of confrontation. The
weight of evidence of this research points to the fact that for most members of these
churches the ancestor cult is rejected. Ancestors
do appear to Christians, but their response as believers is usually to reject the
'visitation'. The 'ancestors', they believe,
are not ancestors at all, but are demon spirits which need to be confronted and exorcised
or idols which need to be spurned - for they only lead to further misery and bondage. They have no power over Christians, because
Christians have the greater power of the Holy Spirit within them, which overcomes all of
Satan's power. This belief was most strongly
found among members of Pentecostal mission and independent churches; but it was also
prominent in indigenous Pentecostal-type churches.
The
findings of this research confirm Daneel's (1971:462) earlier research in Zimbabwe, where
'from the outset the leaders of the prophetic movements launched an attack on all forms of
ancestor "worship"'. He said that the Shona Zionists 'consistently regard
heathen midzimu (ancestors) as 'evil spirits' (mweya yakaipa) from whom they
must break away' (1987:233). The orientation
towards the traditional world view is exhibited by the prophets diagnosing sicknesses and
other problems as caused by ancestors or sorcery. But
in contrast to the traditional diviner, as Daneel (1987:261) has pointed out, instead of
accommodating the ancestor,
The
spirit is branded a demon ... its claims on the patient - especially if these involve
ancestor worship - are rejected and the spirit is exorcised. Here the Holy Spirit and the ancestor spirit are
usually diametrically opposed and it is a matter of confrontation rather than
identification.
In
this research among urban African Pentecostals in Soshanguve there was almost unqualified
rejection of all forms of ancestor rituals, as I have indicated above.
But
there was also a second and opposite response, a view mainly held by some members of
Pentecostal-type churches. This was one of
accommodation and compromise. For a
significant minority in these churches, the ancestors still played an important role, and
they were to be respected and obeyed. They
were seen as the mediators of God, who sometimes revealed the will of God to people, and
who sometimes inspired the prophets. Whether
seen as angels, witnesses in heaven, or mediators between people and God, the traditional
function of the ancestors as the protectors and benefactors of their progeny was preserved
by those who held this view. This more
tolerant and ambivalent attitude to the ancestors confirms what other researchers have
found.
It
must not be thought, however, that this was the predominant reaction to the ancestor cult
among members of these churches. On the
contrary, this research tends to establish the findings of other researchers, notably
Daneel (1987:262) in Zimbabwe, that we have evidence of a Spirit-inspired confrontation
with the ancestor cult which has replaced the traditional beliefs with a truly Christian
alternative. The fact that most of our
interviewees had a clear understanding of the Holy Spirit and were opposed to the practice
of the ancestor cult by Christians, tends to negate the views of earlier researchers that
the ancestor cult had found new expression in the emphasis on pneumatological beliefs and
manifestations in African Pentecostalism. These
views were mostly based on European theological presuppositions that could not really be
substantiated by empirical research. The fact
that the Holy Spirit has taken over some (or all) of the functions of the ancestor
does not mean that he has thereby become the ancestor. It means rather that the doctrine of the Holy
Spirit has become relevant in this very important African context, and that the Spirit has
become the Counsellor and Guide as portrayed in the Scriptures. Far from being a resurgence of traditional
ancestor spirit possession, once we have separated the forms of the Spirit phenomena from
their meaning, the revelations of the Holy Spirit in African Pentecostalism point to a
realistic encounter and confrontation between the new Christian faith and the old
traditional beliefs. Christianity thereby
attains an authentically African character, realistically penetrating the old and creating
the new.
Western
theology has generally not satisfied the African yearning to be protected from the evil
forces that are existentially felt. The
'gospel' has been impoverished because the Spirit of God has not been allowed to fill the
void left after the Christian message has confronted the ancestors. Thus, injustice has been done to the African
Pentecostal churches who have attempted to provide a solution to this emptiness, by
criticising their methods because they do not fit nicely into Western theological
categories.
Anderson,
A H 1991. MOYA: the Holy Spirit in African
context. Pretoria: UNISA
Anderson,
A H 1992a. BAZALWANE: African Pentecostals
in South Africa. Pretoria: UNISA
Anderson,
A H 1992b. 'African Pentecostalism in a South
African urban
environment:
a missiological evaluation'. D Th thesis,
UNISA, Pretoria
Anderson,
A H 1992c. 'Frederick Modise and the
International Pentecost Church: a modern African Messianic movement?' in Missionalia
20:186-200
Daneel,
M L 1971. Old and new in Southern Shona
independent churches: Vol I. The Hague:
Mouton
Daneel,
M L 1973. 'The Christian gospel and the
ancestor cult'in Missionalia 1:46-73
Daneel,
M L 1987. Quest for belonging. Gweru, Zimbabwe: Mambo
ICT
1985. Speaking for ourselves.
Braamfontein: Institute for Contextual Theology
Lukhaimane,
E K 1980. 'The Zion Christian Church of
Ignatius (Engenas) Lekganyane, 1924 to 1948: an African experiment with Christianity'. M.A. thesis, University of the North, Pietersburg
Makhubu,
P 1988. Who are the independent churches?.
Johannesburg: Skotaville
Martin,
M-L 1975. Kimbangu: an African prophet and
his church. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
Pauw,
B A 1960. Religion in a Tswana chiefdom. London: Oxford
Pauw,
B A 1975. Christianity and Xhosa tradition. Cape Town: Oxford
Sundkler,
B G M 1961. Bantu prophets in South Africa.
Oxford: Oxford
Vilakazi,
A 1986. Shembe: the revitalization of
African society. Johannesburg: Skotaville
West,
M 1975. Bishops and prophets in a Black
city. Cape Town: David Philip
©
Allan H Anderson
![]()
[i].
The term 'ancestor' is used rather than
'ancestral spirit', because Africans do not usually speak of the ancestors as 'spirits'. The latter term is only used to differentiate
between the ancestors revealing themselves alone, and the 'ancestral spirit' which
possesses certain people, enabling them to declare the will of the ancestors and to have
extraordinary powers as diviners.
[ii]. Bengt Sundkler (1961:53) was the first to
differentiate between 'Ethiopian' type and 'Zionist' type churches. The Ethiopian-type comprises churches not
necessarily named 'Ethiopian', which originated in a secession from white churches on
racial grounds. They were formed as 'a
reaction against the White mission's conquest of the African peoples'; and yet their
'church organization and Bible interpretation are largely copied from the patterns of the
Protestant Mission Churches from which they have seceded'(:54). In my work, the term 'Pentecostal-type' is used in
preference to Sundkler's 'Zion-type' and Daneel's (1971:285) 'Spirit-type' churches.